A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Some sites could specialize in specific areas of law, even though others offer a broader database. Factors to look at when deciding on a website contain the comprehensiveness of your database, the benefit of navigation, along with the availability of advanced search options.
A survey of PACER buyers, conducted in 2021, measured person satisfaction and determined areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office in the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize potential changes to PACER services and capabilities.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case continues to be or will be filed.
The reported recovery may very well be used, within the most, for corroboration with the main evidence, but by itself it cannot become a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of occurrence. The mentioned memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as absolutely nothing was discovered due to such pointation. The place of prevalence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already inside the knowledge of witnesses just before their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance is usually placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
four. It goes without expressing that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined for the disposal of prompt bail petition.
If a victim is shot at point-blank array, it might still be fair to infer that the accused intended death. However, that is just not always the case.
Extra username and password are needed for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there might exist conflicts between the varied reduce appellate courts. Sometimes these differences may not be resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered about the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father with the petitioner and as per Tale of FIR, the petitioner is an eyewkness in the prevalence.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
three. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types read more of evidence as well as the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed at the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, As a result, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have negative effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out from the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.